First, this is the real question I want get answer to .
Second, this is my little Google test. At this moment exact google request "How to find out the most popular pages of a site?" gives no result as well as "To find out the most popular pages of a site" and "this is my little Google test" phrases.
Let's see whether the Google is able to find my tiny experimental post.
"What kind of self-confident idiot you must be to make such dirty money in the country which gives you a lot of opportunities to make money without breaking the law?"
Dylan Boyd from eROI Email Marketing Agency recently posted "What Kind of Email Do You Get?" article. There he points to interesting study on counting what type of email people get during given period of time. Of course, spam takes a huge part of those emails.
There's Email Analyst by Email Data Source which let you have such statistics for you and produces reports to answer the question "What Kind of Email Do You Get?".
However, as for me, it is even more valuable to have another type of report: "What kind of email do you respond?" Many people couldn't care less about what they actually doing with their email.
I guess a there's would be a lot of surprises for many users like responded spam letters.
P.S. Just figures out that USA leads in the spam business.
This post was originally a comment to Why We Are Still At War post by theemailwars.com blog.
One of the main reasons why spam actually works: because there are people which thoughtless enough to click spam links.
It is the subject of right anti-spam propaganda to make people understood their risks when clicking spam links. Surely, it is important to explain anyone the danger scams of using spam resources; but it is even more important to explain that usual goods being sell via spam are pretty dangerous enough to affect their life badly. For example, phentermine is not a toy for weight loss but real power drug which will control their life if used enormously.
There's lack of such anti-spam campaigns in the web.
Robert H. Smith's study (see link at the top of this post) proves that at least 11% of users purchase products and services from spam e-mails.
But it is interesting to make deeper exploration of spam-clickers. We should separate this whole community into groups by spam subject they respond to. For example, there will be viagra-clickers group, spam-insurance consumers and so on. After we have such study, it is possible to make targeted anti-spam campaigns to explain people why responding to spam messages is bad in any case.
And every subgroup of spam consumers should receive corresponding explanation why spam doesn't worth responding. Then spam will lose its supplying roots. So it won't worth sending, and so will go away.
We attacked by a tons of blog spam comments offering phentermine and other "useful" drugs.
But who really buys them? I have never used to use it; my friends too.
Do you have any friends or relatives who buys phentermine?
Today I've got another interesting spam message. Surely it is the first one that really doesn't annoy me because it is a bit unusual! The message just invites me to attend a Yoga seminar for people with loaded lifestyle. If someone is really interested, I even can give a link here.
And there's the main point: googling "yoga for business people" gives just 32 results. It is great area to investigate creation of trafficable site, I think.
The main idea of Anti Spam Business was simple.
Then I've changed my mind so this new blog is appeared.
